|
|
Post by squirrel on Nov 16, 2011 10:29:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Solus Hospes on Nov 16, 2011 11:42:22 GMT -5
Yay! Thank you for posting this! We were certainly not downplaying the safety concern and even agreed that it was our concern as well but as quoted, we just don't want the vagueness of the policy to be used as an excuse to take unlawful action against us.
What the article didn't explain is that the Commissioners agreed to diagram the other four major buildings with the no protest safety zones clearly marked and to make the language of the policy more definitive. This way there's no confusion and little or no gray area of interpretation.
|
|
|
|
Post by squirrel on Nov 16, 2011 12:28:01 GMT -5
Good info. Thanks for filling in the details for me. Florida Today is atrocious about telling the full story.
|
|
|
|
Post by Solus Hospes on Nov 16, 2011 15:53:38 GMT -5
 You're welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by Mireille on Nov 17, 2011 18:24:04 GMT -5
Are those all occupy/99% people (apart from the vet in yellow, who I've seen at many 99% events)? A lot of tea party-like messages there...
|
|
|
|
Post by evanne on Nov 17, 2011 18:40:29 GMT -5
The guys with the signs in the pic are not our people. The Tea Party also had issues with the same proposals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mireille on Nov 17, 2011 18:50:36 GMT -5
The article is a little misleading. The pic is not our people but the article quoted an occupy rep. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
Post by evanne on Nov 17, 2011 19:35:30 GMT -5
Yea, I noticed that when I read it too, but o well. Getting the Occupy name out there is great, regardless.
|
|
You're welcome. 
