|
Post by evanne on Nov 10, 2011 15:56:04 GMT -5
The recent GA passed a proposal for us to mic check the passing of these proposals. Is there some reference as to why?
Please read and post which parts we are opposing so Direct Action can write and distribute something for people to read.
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by James on Nov 10, 2011 22:42:15 GMT -5
It was something about limiting where people can assemble or something... If we are talking about the same thing. I actually recall that it wasn't explained very clearly. There was lots of loud-talking.
|
|
|
Post by evanne on Nov 11, 2011 1:21:56 GMT -5
That sounds right...but nothing in these seems to say that. This mostly seems to be about limiting protesting within what seem like reasonable guidelines. I don't wanna waste the power of a people's mic.
|
|
|
Post by Solus Hospes on Nov 12, 2011 11:56:56 GMT -5
My solution is for us to pose questions to the council in regards to this to have their assurances or stances on record. So less a peoples mic and more participation in the motion.
|
|
|
Post by evanne on Nov 12, 2011 22:25:59 GMT -5
OMG! I think that might be the best idea EVAR!
|
|
|
Post by Solus Hospes on Nov 13, 2011 10:24:41 GMT -5
^^ I have my moments.
|
|